The Global Warming Skeptics Forum  

Go Back   The Global Warming Skeptics Forum > Stratosphere > The Groundhog Forum
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-20-2008, 04:30 PM
AEGeneral's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Saturn
Posts: 1,034
Blog Entries: 1
AEGeneral has disabled reputation
Default Groundhogs Target Cow Farts

If you haven't figured it out, I refer to "climate change experts" as "groundhogs." I don't see any differences between the two.

I've always said these idiots want to control the food supply and dictate what people are eating.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/mai...-mostviewedbox

Quote:
Experts at the Rowett Research Institute in Aberdeen say the average cow contributes as much to global warming as a family car that travels 12,000 miles.

Although vehicles produce a far larger volume of noxious gases, methane is 24 times more harmful to the environment than carbon dioxide.
In total, methane is thought to contribute about 18 per cent towards the global warming effect.
On another note:

Quote:
The New Zealand government briefly considered taxing farmers on their herds' methane output but the proposal had to be dropped following opposition.
Oppose the cow fart tax!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-20-2008, 04:58 PM
Lt Colonel
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: calgary, alta
Posts: 795
mcclane will move up through the ranks soon enoughmcclane will move up through the ranks soon enough
Default

I read that they did reduce farting in sheep by 70%. I get really nervous when scientists start mucking around with our food source. You know, if cow farts are that bad for the environment, what is next ? cull all cattle to reduce greenhouse gases ?? what about us humans ? what I gotta cut one I just let 'er rip, so am I contributing to global climate change by letting a juicy one rip ??

This is just becoming utterly *no pun intended* ridiculous. Seems like somehow some way environmentalists are making absurd links to global warming.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-20-2008, 05:14 PM
AEGeneral's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Saturn
Posts: 1,034
Blog Entries: 1
AEGeneral has disabled reputation
Default

Yeah, sounds like the cows ain't having it. Maybe they like farting.

My fear is the tax is coming, which will raise food prices even more. You've noticed your grocery bill getting higher, and so have I. Couple this with higher energy costs, and inevitably inflation is going to take off.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-20-2008, 05:57 PM
Lt Colonel
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: calgary, alta
Posts: 795
mcclane will move up through the ranks soon enoughmcclane will move up through the ranks soon enough
Default

I'm not vegetarian, I do like a good steak once in a while. Coupled with mad cow disease, like you mentioned this will only drive up prices of groceries even more. When will people wake up and realize the real cost of going green ??
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-20-2008, 06:00 PM
AEGeneral's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Saturn
Posts: 1,034
Blog Entries: 1
AEGeneral has disabled reputation
Default

I guess when they start reading this forum.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-11-2008, 06:49 AM
AEGeneral's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Saturn
Posts: 1,034
Blog Entries: 1
AEGeneral has disabled reputation
Default

RIA Novosti - World - Estonian farmers face flatulence tax on cattle

Quote:
Estonian farmers have received tax notices for methane emissions from their cattle, the country's opposition party, the People's Union of Estonia, said on Thursday.

Ruminants produce large quantities of methane gas through belching and flatulence when they digest grass, which accounts for about 15-25% of overall gas emissions, according to different estimates.
Well, there goes the price of beef in Estonia...
__________________
"Skepticism is the highest of duties, and blind faith the unpardonable sin." -- Thomas Huxley
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-12-2008, 04:50 PM
Lt Colonel
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: calgary, alta
Posts: 795
mcclane will move up through the ranks soon enoughmcclane will move up through the ranks soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AEGeneral View Post
RIA Novosti - World - Estonian farmers face flatulence tax on cattle



Well, there goes the price of beef in Estonia...
maybe they can 'carbon capture' cow farts !!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-12-2008, 05:19 PM
AEGeneral's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Saturn
Posts: 1,034
Blog Entries: 1
AEGeneral has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcclane View Post
maybe they can 'carbon capture' cow farts !!
Man...that's a sad visual right there. Since carbon sequestration is all the rage these days, I bet some scientist is down in his basement right now designing a machine to pump cow farts into reservoirs beneath the surface.

Of course, it's happened in the past that a massive CO2 bubble rose to the surface & exploded, and it killed quite a few people. Happened over in Africa a few decades ago.

I can think of a million better ways to depart the planet than being killed by a massive cow fart that escaped from the depths of the earth.
__________________
"Skepticism is the highest of duties, and blind faith the unpardonable sin." -- Thomas Huxley
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:05 PM
Lt Colonel
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: calgary, alta
Posts: 795
mcclane will move up through the ranks soon enoughmcclane will move up through the ranks soon enough
Default

that is just too funny !!

pardon my ignorance, but I just don't see how this carbon capture will help overall. if you pump co2 underground, there will come a time when the earth is just too saturated with co2 and then what happens ? if the environmentalists claim co2 is bad for the stuff on top of the earth, won't it also kill plants underground ? what i'm trying to say is, the roots of plants and crops, won't that become affected ?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:39 PM
AEGeneral's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Saturn
Posts: 1,034
Blog Entries: 1
AEGeneral has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcclane View Post
that is just too funny !!

pardon my ignorance, but I just don't see how this carbon capture will help overall. if you pump co2 underground, there will come a time when the earth is just too saturated with co2 and then what happens ? if the environmentalists claim co2 is bad for the stuff on top of the earth, won't it also kill plants underground ? what i'm trying to say is, the roots of plants and crops, won't that become affected ?
They pump it far deeper than that. I have seen one feasible use for sequestration, and that is to use CO2 to help recover more oil:

Weyburn-Midale CO2 Project

About PTRC



Quote:
The project’s Final Phase (2005-2011) is building on the successes of the First Phase (2000 – 2004) to deliver the framework necessary to encourage implementation of CO2 geological storage on a worldwide basis.

The project is operated in conjunction with two billion-dollar commercial CO2 floods in Saskatchewan, Canada, where huge volumes of the gas are captured from an industrial source and injected to revive oil production.
The "worldwide" part scares me. Using sequestration in different areas to increase oil production is one thing; just pumping the stuff underground all over the place is quite another.

That vision of Praxis in one of the Star Trek movies comes to mind. Yeah, I'm overreacting, but you get what I'm saying.
__________________
"Skepticism is the highest of duties, and blind faith the unpardonable sin." -- Thomas Huxley
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:08 PM
Lt Colonel
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: calgary, alta
Posts: 795
mcclane will move up through the ranks soon enoughmcclane will move up through the ranks soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AEGeneral View Post
They pump it far deeper than that. I have seen one feasible use for sequestration, and that is to use CO2 to help recover more oil:

Weyburn-Midale CO2 Project

About PTRC



The "worldwide" part scares me. Using sequestration in different areas to increase oil production is one thing; just pumping the stuff underground all over the place is quite another.

That vision of Praxis in one of the Star Trek movies comes to mind. Yeah, I'm overreacting, but you get what I'm saying.
praxis ? is that the one where the planet self destructs ?

If so, that is one of the things i've been wondering about. As you and I know, the enviro-whackos have a habit of complaining about all the 'wasteful' habits of man, and trying to stop all this behaviour, however they offer no concrete alternative in its place. I for one am skeptical about carbon capture. Do we know enough about carbon capture that it is safe ? There has been many examples that we've come up from the environmentalists that just doesn't make sense, like biofuels, and those CFLs (which contain mercury). People should really ask alot of questions about not just carbon capture about any ideas coming from environmentalists, because it isn't just the environment at stake but many other things as well.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:22 PM
AEGeneral's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Saturn
Posts: 1,034
Blog Entries: 1
AEGeneral has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcclane View Post
praxis ? is that the one where the planet self destructs ?

If so, that is one of the things i've been wondering about. As you and I know, the enviro-whackos have a habit of complaining about all the 'wasteful' habits of man, and trying to stop all this behaviour, however they offer no concrete alternative in its place. I for one am skeptical about carbon capture. Do we know enough about carbon capture that it is safe ? There has been many examples that we've come up from the environmentalists that just doesn't make sense, like biofuels, and those CFLs (which contain mercury). People should really ask alot of questions about not just carbon capture about any ideas coming from environmentalists, because it isn't just the environment at stake but many other things as well.
Yep. The whole planet blows up. I think it was the klingon planet where they got all their energy sources from. I don't know much about Star Trek, just watched some of the movies and remembered that scene.

Funny how the whole "mercury" thing just came to light recently (ouch, no pun intended there). The food riots started last January (2007), but before now, none of the major networks in the US picked up on what was happening. I still don't know that all of them are reporting it, but the discussion has at least reached Congress. Inevitably, most of them will have to cover it.

But why did it take this long? You hit the nail on the head.

You're right, no one seems to ask any questions. Just like with a climate model, they skip to the results without the least bit of curiosity or concern as to what's in it or how it works.

What's in a CFL? What might using corn-based ethanol do to the price of food? They're too busy calculating how much energy a CFL or biofuels might save. Maybe they're so blinded by their own personal advocacy of environmentalism that they can't see the forest for the trees -- no pun intended there, either.

But they'll speculate for hours on what Brittney Spears ate for dinner last night. Priorities?
__________________
"Skepticism is the highest of duties, and blind faith the unpardonable sin." -- Thomas Huxley
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-13-2008, 08:29 PM
Lt Colonel
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: calgary, alta
Posts: 795
mcclane will move up through the ranks soon enoughmcclane will move up through the ranks soon enough
Default

After careful consideration, haven't you noticed in the news that if something is blatantly obvious, for example the food riots and high fuel prices, we've stated that environmentalists are obstructionists to progress. We've connected that dots that environmentalists, with their yammering, are preventing oil companies from drilling oil which of course causes oil prices to skyrocket. With high oil prices everything becomes that much more expensive. And the news has barely touched on the fact that the food riots are caused by farmers cashing in on the biofuel craze. Note that these tidbits of info are conviently left out from the news.

I for one have not taken the environmentalists facts are the end all and be all. I just consider them lies and propaganda to fool the average joe.

And yes, the public seems to wallow as to whether britney will be wearing panties or not. *sigh* priorities eh ?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-06-2008, 03:11 PM
AEGeneral's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Saturn
Posts: 1,034
Blog Entries: 1
AEGeneral has disabled reputation
Default

FOXNews.com - Scientists Seek Vaccine for Livestock Flatulence - Science News | Science & Technology | Technology News

Quote:
Feeling guilty about their country's greenhouse-gas emissions, New Zealand scientists want to squelch the biggest source: livestock flatulence.

So it was with great pride Wednesday that Phil Goff, the Kiwi trade minister, told a Paris meeting of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development that the genome of the microbe responsible for all that methane had been isolated.

That would pave the way for a vaccine against bovine flatulence, he added, according to the Daily Telegraph.


Of course, because those same gassy bacteria also give sheep, cattle and their kin the ability to digest grass and hay, the vaccine could just cause mass livestock starvation.
Bovine Flatulence Obsession Syndrome is real. What more evidence do we need?
__________________
"Skepticism is the highest of duties, and blind faith the unpardonable sin." -- Thomas Huxley
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-06-2008, 05:00 PM
Captain
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Santee, CA
Posts: 171
Dennis will move up through the ranks soon enoughDennis will move up through the ranks soon enough
Default

Gee,

I'm doing my part to reduce cow fart induced global warming. I grill steaks every Sunday.

This is serious stuff. As we speak scientists are doing studies to see if dinosaurs farted their way into extinction.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0