IPCC Under the Microscope

[AEGeneral]

The International Climate Science Coalition has provided 50 articles for reference about the IPCC and their "credibility."

Shouldn't you also be suspicious of an organization that seeks to imply (or fails to correct false perceptions) that
- it is impartial when it is clearly not,
- that its authors and reviewers have no vested interest when most do,
- that its climate models are accurate when they are not,
- that all reviewers support the IPCC's fundamental claims when very few explicitly do so
- that its authors have a wide range of opinions and experience when many work together or have co-authored papers together
- that all its authors support the critical claim when many merely reported on observations and far more others had to work from the assumption that the claim was correct?

The IPCC under the Microscope

[mcclane]

with the IPCC, I think the media should be slammed for selectively picking the data from the IPCC reports for public consumption.

It is a well known fact that the media has embellished the higher end of the temp increases on 'global warming', but they never mention the minimum increase. with this, it definitely spurs the public fears.

I'm currently reading Glenn Beck's An Inconvenient Book, and he makes a good point regarding global warming, it is a very complex issue, and until we know more about it we should only take reports (such as the IPCC) with a grain of salt, as the IPCC models are far from accurate.