The Global Warming Skeptics Forum  

Go Back   The Global Warming Skeptics Forum > Stratosphere > The Groundhog Forum
Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-23-2008, 04:49 PM
Colonel
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,947
News Feeder is on a distinguished road
Default Roy Spencer’s testimony before congress backs up Monckton’s assertions on climate sensitivity

Roy Spencer’s testimony before congress backs up Monckton’s assertions on climate sensitivity « Watts Up With That?
If true, an insensitive climate system would mean that we have little to worry about in the way of manmade global warming and associated climate change. And, as we will see, it would also mean that the warming we have experienced in the last 100 years is mostly natural. Of course, if climate change is mostly natural then it is largely out of our control, and is likely to end — if it has not ended already, since satellite-measured global temperatures have not warmed for at least seven years now.

More...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-23-2008, 10:12 PM
Captain
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Santee, CA
Posts: 171
Dennis will move up through the ranks soon enoughDennis will move up through the ranks soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by News Feeder View Post
Roy Spencer’s testimony before congress backs up Monckton’s assertions on climate sensitivity « Watts Up With That?
If true, an insensitive climate system would mean that we have little to worry about in the way of manmade global warming and associated climate change. And, as we will see, it would also mean that the warming we have experienced in the last 100 years is mostly natural. Of course, if climate change is mostly natural then it is largely out of our control, and is likely to end — if it has not ended already, since satellite-measured global temperatures have not warmed for at least seven years now.

More...
Well, Barbara Boxer basically attacked him for being linked to Rush Limbaugh who calls him, tongue-in-cheek, the "Official EIB Climatologist." Barbara Boxer obviously lives and breathes the motto, "when you don't have the facts on your side, attack the messenger." To me, she comes across as exactly what she is, one of the biggest idiots in Congress. Babs, at least Dr. Roy Spencer is, in fact, a Climatologist. Once cannot say the same thing for algore's hired liar, Dr. James Hansen.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0